Expert Analysis
Timing and Choice of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy
Source: CCO Official Conference Coverage of the 2008 International AIDS Conference
Timing and Choice of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy
  
- Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH
- José Gatell, MD
- W. David Hardy, MD
|
|
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:
- Explain new findings from prospective and retrospective studies comparing different NRTI backbones in first-line antiretroviral therapy
- Discuss new data on the relative efficacy of various antiretroviral agents in first-line therapy
- Describe the role of immunologic response to HAART in patient outcomes and the implications for the benefit of early first-line treatment
- Cite new results on the safety and efficacy of different boosted PI regimens among racial subgroups
Topics covered include:
- ACTG 5202: Abacavir/Lamivudine vs Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Treatment-Naive Patients With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL
- Reanalysis of Abacavir Studies Using ACTG 5202 Endpoints
- HEAT Study: Abacavir/Lamivudine vs Tenofovir/Emtricitabine, Both With Lopinavir/Ritonavir, at 96 Weeks
- Efavirenz vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Naive Patients With Very Low CD4+ Cell Counts
- Protocol 004: Efavirenz vs Raltegravir in Treatment-Naive Patients at 96 Weeks
- Rilpivirine, a Second-Generation NNRTI vs Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Patients at 96 Weeks
- First-line Didanosine-EC, Emtricitabine, Atazanavir in Resource-Limited Settings
- 100-mg Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Ritonavir Is Bioequivalent to the Soft-Gel Capsule in Single-Dose, Open-Label Crossover Study
- MONARK: Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy at 96 Weeks
- GS 903E: 7-Year Data, in a Small Cohort of Patients, on the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Plus Efavirenz
- Substitution of Abacavir/Lamivudine for Thymidine Analogue NRTIs Maintains Virologic Efficacy and Offers Some Immunologic Advantages
- Analyses of Response to Antiretrovirals by Race
- Treatment of Acute HIV Infection With an NNRTI-Based Regimen Rather Than a Boosted PI-Based Regimen Effective in a Small Cohort
- IDX899 and RDEA06, 2 Novel NNRTIs, Show Considerable Promise in Phase IIa Trials
- Data From the MACS Cohort Indicate That Higher CD4+ Cell Counts Are Independently Associated With Lower Risk of AIDS and Death
- ATHENA Cohort: The Importance of Early Diagnosis
|
Disclaimer: The materials published on the Clinical Care Options
Web site reflect the views of the reviewers or authors of the
CCO
material, not those of Clinical Care Options, LLC, the CME provider,
or the companies providing educational grants. The materials may
discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been
approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A qualified
healthcare professional should be consulted before using any therapeutic
product discussed. Readers should verify all information and data before
treating patients or using any therapies described in these materials.
|
Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC.
Contact Info
Educational grants provided by:
Educational grants support only the CME-certified components of this program.
CCO Resources
Timing and Choice of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy
|
|